辩论中的argument要求 辩论中warrant

辩论赛规则英文版

辩论赛规则英文版

辩论中的argument要求 辩论中warrant

辩论中的argument要求 辩论中warrant

辩论中的argument要求 辩论中warrant

辩论赛也叫论辩赛，还叫做辩论会。它在形式上是参赛双方就某一问题进行辩论的`一种竞赛活动，实际上是围绕辩论的问题而展开的一种相关知识的竞赛，英文版的辩论赛规则大家知道么？大家不妨来看看我推送的辩论赛规则英文版，希望给大家带来帮助！

A， shall be borne by the chairman of the debate

1， the debate began

2， announced the motion

3， introduce the participating team and its ition

4， introduce team member

5， introduce rules， judges and staff

6， debate competition

7， the judges review

8， for audience questions， the judges score (simultaneous)

9， announced the result of the match

The debate over 10

Second， the process of the debate

1， the theoretical stage defense:

(1) itive and argue against a speech made by itive and negative sides ZhuBian stated his own first main point. Must be completed within the specified time.

(2) itive and opite two apology speech square 2， against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view，

(3) itive and opite three speech by square three， against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical ysis， provide arguments to support his own views.

Phase 2， free debate by tetragonal speak first， then the opition spokean， sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)

3， summarize four contend for final statement by both parties， summarizes has side view， refute each other subjective point:

(1) argue against four summation

(2) square four summation

4. Audience member: the audience to questions of both players， players must give the answer patiently. Stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.

5， the judges scoring stage

6， the judges review the process of both views and debate.

7， the announcement

Three， the rules of the debate

1， each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time， over time， in accordance with abstained processing， and lose from team total score 5 points.

2， free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams， the first to speak with a member of tetragonal， then one by opition players， the two sides take turns， until youn out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete， what time each other， each stick words between 60-800 words， can only ask a question at a time.)

Fourth， criteria

(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the .

(2) criteria

1， point clear， argument is sufficient， citing appropriate， yzed thoroughly.

2， grabbed the other views and error， precedents and precise， and to the point.

3， reflect agile， strong ability to deal with.

4， articulate， ll clear， tight logic.

(3) the scoring mod (group and individual scores respectively， out of 100)

(1) the topic: can the logic， theory， from the ition held by the fact that such as multi-ll and multi-angle， argument is sufficient， reasoning is clear， wher for his own difficulties with effective treatment mods.

(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument， argument is sufficient， wher logical reasoning process， the fact wher the reference is proper， true.

(3) dis: to ask wher to grab the key， the problem . No questions or questions within the time required， should be appropriate. The question of wher or not to answer each other， can you give a person the sense with justified. Don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.

(4) : wher to he team spirit， mutual support， debate cohesion is closely. Wher q&a form an organic whole， to a powerful blow to the other party.

(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. Personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.

(4) points: ry topic， argument， dis， cooperate， argue the wind project， do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules， are appropriate. Due to the fault causes of incidents affect the ， is decided by the jury， in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.

(5) score project group and individual points per comparison table is as follows:

(6) score project group and individual points per of appraisal form

(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. The of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain， formula is: the total integral/attend the session.

(8) the outcome of judgment

1， the outcome of the ， on the basis of a few judges play group points， remove the a and a minimum points， calculating the remaining points scored an erage of judgement.

2， debater individual scoring points calculation mod， calculation mod with groups only as an individual award review basis， has nothing to do with judging each outcome.

Five， awards and incentives

1， ry are selected each a good debater each team， will decide after the one of the best debater.

;

如何分辨是argument与discussion

argument 是指驳斥，既要找出逻辑错误，又要分析整体构架，也就是找错并且驳斥。 discussion是指客观分析多重解释，不一定驳斥也不一定接受

貌似argument也并非都带有贬义 对于一个问题的讨论 也有用argument的情况

argument: 多用于指辩论双方均以事实或理由来说服对方的辨论。有点比discussion更正式的意味。

而discussion 则用于更普遍就是讨论 说自己的观点

Issue和Argument的区别及技巧

Issue要求考生根据所给的题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。Issue题库涉及、文化、科技、历史、、艺术等诸多方面。不同类型的题目有较大别，但在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题方向非常接近的题目。

Argument要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力地驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。Argument部分，首先要熟悉每一个题目，找出主要的逻辑错误，也就是Argument题目的提纲，同时每一个逻辑错误准备一套语言套路去说。写完每一个题目的提纲后，写10-15篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话，可以增加写作量)，找partner帮你改，知道错误以后再重写。

辩论中mock argument什么意思

从英文字面理解，就是说的是参数匹配相关的事，也就是在mock中，这块主要是为了处理方法间调用传入的不同参数，返回不同内容使用的。argument的基本意思是指互相认识或不认识的个人之间的“争论，争吵，辩论”，可以是理性的摆事实、讲道理，也可以是诉诸感情的激烈争论。分歧可能因此而解决，也可能不能解决。指一次争论或辩论时是可数名词，其他情况下多为不可数名词。

argument还可以表示“说理，论证”，强调重证据，以理服人，双方都想证明自己正确，并说服对方赞同自己的看法和立场。是不可数名词。

argument表示“理由”时，专指能说服别人同意自己的看法或站在自己的立场的论据或论点。表示“讲话、讨论的议题”时，指为某个特定文学作品或讲话事先选定的主题，有时也指简述中心思想或概括发展情节的梗概。argument作此二解时是可数名词。

英语辩论赛需要注意哪些细节

首先注意着装

其次注意队员是否团结

再次消除紧张

第四观察辩友，轻蔑辩友

第五热身英语交流

第六注意主题

第七把握节奏

第八不能忘记总结